Why scientists argue that the universe should not exist - 91 Vital

Breaking

Post Top Ad

Post Top Ad

Wednesday 1 November 2017

Why scientists argue that the universe should not exist

Our universe should not exist, scientists say. The best scientists around the world are still struggling to find why the universe was not destroyed once it was created. That, science says, should have happened, but it certainly did not happen.

At the beginning of the universe, according to the model model, there were equal amounts of matter and anti-matter. The problem with this is supposed to have wiped out each other, dissolving everything.

Researchers are frantically looking for a difference between matter and anti-matter that could explain why the universe still exists. But they have tried a number of different theories - not different mass, electric charge or something else, but they have not found any difference.

This has led researchers to wonder why the universe still exists.

"All of our observations find a complete symmetry between matter and antimatter, so the universe should not really exist," explained Christina Smorma, author of the new study conducted at CERN.

"An asymmetry must be somewhere here, just do not understand where the difference is. What is the source of the symmetry break? "

The last solution would be the different magnetism of matter and antimatter. But new research shows that they are identical and in this way - adding another mystery to the question of why the world still exists.

The new study, led by Dr. Smorra, seemed to measure antiprotons to find out how they were different from the protons that surround us. They measured the magnetism of the antimatter in more detail than ever and were surprised to find that matter and antimatter seemed exactly symmetrical.

Researchers now hope they will be able to look at antiprotons in even more accurate ways and see if there is a difference.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Post Top Ad

lt;!---->